Founding Fathers Deemed Homegrown Terrorist!
"homegrown terrorism" = the use, planned use or threatened use of force ....
by a group or individual born, raised, or based and operating primarily within the United States...
to intimidate or coerce the United States government, the civilian population of the United States,
... in furtherance of political or social objectives.
Forget lobbying... forget emailing, faxing or calling a Congressman, Senator or the White House as
your planned and actual use of communication to voice your concern over a bill, resolution or veto is politically oriented and now deemed
"homegrown terrorism"!
Question authority, go to Jail!
Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif., House Resolution 1955, otherwise known as the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007, says House Resolution 1955 is a much-needed piece of national security legislation!
The American Civil Liberties Union says HR 1955, which Harman sponsored, is one step too close to an Orwellian nightmare!
Fact: more House politicians missed the vote than voted against it.
Yeas = 404
Neas = 6
Twenty didn't bother to vote!
What is this bill about? Officially the bill states: "to prevent homegrown terrorism, and for other purposes".
What's the big deal? Doesn't everyone want to "to prevent homegrown terrorism"?
H.R. 1955 defines "homegrown terrorism" as merely "the use, planned use or threatened use of force or violence by a group or individual born, raised, or based and operating primarily within the United States or any possession of the United States to intimidate or coerce the United States government, the civilian population of the United States, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives".
H.R. 1955 defines "violent radicalization" as "the process of adopting or promoting an extremist belief system for the purpose of facilitating ideologically based violence to advance political, religious or social change." Ideologically based violence, in turn, is defined as "the use, planned use or threatened use of force or violence by a group or individual to promote the group or individual's political, religious or social beliefs."
Hand out fliers against gay marriage = a terrorist!
Walk in a Gay Pride parade promoting gay marriage = a terrorist!
Everything up is down again. Double speak is alive and well dear members.
As Scott Hill at Alternet wrote: To counter and squelch Americans who are truly alarmed at this bill, Chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security Bennie Thompson actually had to post a fact sheet in December arguing, among other hilarious things, that the resolution "does not legislate thought or protected political expression and free speech. There are no provisions seeking to change the criminal code or set up a 'Big Brother' regime to put Americans under surveillance."
His conclusion: Me thinks the pol doth protest too much!
On the eve of Martin Luther King day, we can't think of any better subject that needs to be addressed by
the American people. Stop the bus, stop the sitting in the back of the bus! Head 'em up, move 'em out! Marching in the streets is:
"the use, planned use or threatened use of force or violence by a group or individual born, raised, or based and operating primarily within the United States or any possession of the United States to intimidate or coerce the United States government, the civilian population of the United States, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives".
Dr. King must have been a homegrown terrorist!
There's one action that every American needs to take right now. We need to send a very firm instruction to stop H.R./S. 1955 in the Senate NOW!
Click here to tell the entire Senate, vote NO on S. 1955 the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 by sending your ActiFax Blasts (that's 100 faxes for $25) to the entire Senate.
Join us as we stand with our Founding Fathers who stood for liberty and justice for all, even those who voiced opposition to governmental acts!
Housekeeping note:
Free Listing of all Congressmen and Senators here.
Dear Laptop Leader,
Some things never change. More commissions. More government. More regulation.
Presidential candidate Ron Paul stated: "It will no doubt prove to be another bureaucracy that artificially inflates problems so as to guarantee its future existence and funding," Paul predicted in his House speech. "But it may do so at great further expense to our civil liberties." It is, he concluded, an "unwise and dangerous solution in search of a real problem."
Presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich, who was one of the scant few to vote against the resolution, was equally suspicious, calling it the "thought crime bill" during a speech to supporters in December.
The bill creates and establishes a National Commission and Center of Excellence. Do we need another do nothing Commission?
Remember the 9/11 commission? How many recommendations were adopted and put it effect? None. Zilch. Nada.
What's wrong with this picture?
Is the exercise of Free Speech still valued in America?
Is the right to assemble to discuss political movements still a hallowed sacred right in America?
Is the right to petition the government for change....even by a planned use of email, fax, phone call, or letter writing campaign cherished by Americans?
This HR/S 1955 bill is a giant step to squelch political dissent and needs to be abandoned immediately.
You dear LaptopAmerican call your Congressional rep telling him or her to vote "YEA" or "NAY".
You dear LaptopAmerican send an email asking your Congressman or Senator to vote this way or that way on a bill.
MoveOn.org sends out an email blasts to its supporters asking them to vote for more Communism and Socialism by electing Democrats who want to institute a national health care system.
Or you refuse to sit in the back of the bus because you just aren't going to take it anymore! The force you use to stay sitting for political and social change is NOW homegrown terrorism.
Is force just physical?
What about all this political activism?
This phoning activity is a
1. planned use
2. of force
3. by a group or individual
4. within the United States
5. to coerce the government
6. in furtherance of political objectives!
There goes any lobbyist job! Maybe this bill isn't so bad after all?
All of these items now are defined as homegrown terrorism thanks to HR 1955, so expect a visit from Homeland Security, the FBI and the local sheriff to silence YOU!
House Rep Jane Harman sponsored the bill. Who funds her?
|
JANE HARMAN (D-CA)
Top Contributors
| 1 |
Edison International |
$14,000 |
| 2 |
Boeing Co |
$7,000 |
| 2 |
Raytheon Co |
$7,000 |
| 4 |
Northrop Grumman |
$5,000 |
| 5 |
Intelligent Optical Systems |
$4,000 |
| 6 |
Southern California Edison |
$3,250 |
|
It appears that the defense industry is alive and well in helping politicians decide which bills to sponsor! The more homegrown terrorist there are, the more companies like those above are needed to build counter intelligence systems, etc.
Paul Craig Robers writes: On October 23, 2007, the House passed a bill sponsored by California Democratic congresswoman Jane Harman, chairwoman of a Homeland Security subcommittee, that overturns the constitutionally guaranteed rights to free expression, association, and assembly.
Basically the bill will create a commission tasked with identifying extremist people, groups, and ideas.
"I know not whether taxes are raised to fight wars, or wars are started to raise taxes." -- Thomas Paine, in COMMON SENSE (1776)
"The tree of Liberty must be watered from time to time with the blood of tyrants and patriots." -- Thomas Jefferson
"I go on the principle that a public debt is a public curse." -- James Madison
"Give me Liberty or give me Death" -- Patrick Henry
"Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master." -- George Washington
"Wherever the real power in a Government lies, there is the danger of oppression." -- James Madison
"It's not tyranny we desire; it's a just, limited, federal government." -- Alexander Hamilton
"To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them." -- Henry Lee
"Society in every state is a blessing, but government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one." -- Thomas Paine
"The mystery of government is not how Washington works but how to make it stop." -- P.J. O'Rourke
"The government is like a baby's alimentary canal, with a happy appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other." -- Ronald Reagan
"When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." -- Thomas Jefferson
"Liberty has never come from government. Liberty has always come from the subjects of government. The history of liberty is the history of resistance." -- Woodrow Wilson
"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters." -- Daniel Webster
Terrorist, terrorist, terrorist! Apparently our country was founded by them.
Click here to tell the entire Senate, vote NO on S. 1955 the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 by sending your ActiFax Blasts (that's 100 faxes for $25) to the entire Senate.
Join us as we stand with our Founding Fathers who stood for liberty and justice for all, even those who voiced opposition to governmental acts!
Principles of Property*
Setting a firm foundation for Liberty
Americans owe their form and style of 'government', love it or hate it, to a few men prior to Thomas Jefferson's penning his infamous words in the Declaration of Independence.
Algernon Sidney wrote his Discourses Concerning Government in 1683 but was beheaded by Charles the II for placing sovereignty in the people rather than the monarch before he could publish it. Locke published his First and Second Treatise of Government in 1689 unsigned for fear of the same treatment.
Locke began his second treatise with the State of Nature and the Law of Nature that men find themselves in without government or when government is dissolved. He bases all government upon the natural God given rights to each person in the state of nature and showed that government can never lawfully acquire more authority than any one person has in a state of nature. Locke demonstrated the following realities:
- In a state of nature individuals are at full liberty to do with their life, liberty and possessions (or property) as they wish without asking any other person or group.
- All persons are free to do as they wish as long as they do not harm another in their life, liberty or possessions.
- People join together under contracts or constitutions for the sole purpose of the protection of the property of each individual in the society.
- Locke said when the state is created by consent the power of it is based upon the authority in each individual to protect their own property in a state of nature with force if necessary. The French economist, Frederick Bastiat, proved this further in his book The Law written in 1850.
- All power in government is based upon the delegated authority of the individuals not the transfer of their properties consisting of life liberty and possessions to the state.
- The State, therefore, cannot acquire property consisting of life, liberty or property. Therefore the state is not sovereign over the people who create it.
- The State is the agent of the people to protect their lives liberties and possessions. This is also stated by Alexander Hamilton in Federalist Letter 78.
- The State is sovereign and must remain so related to foreign, states, nations and foreign citizens of same or it is thereby dissolved.

Click here to tell the entire Senate, vote NO on S. 1955 the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 by sending your ActiFax Blasts (that's 100 faxes for $25) to the entire Senate.
Join us as we stand with our Founding Fathers who stood for liberty and justice for all, even those who voiced opposition to governmental acts!
First principle--Endowed by
God with rights
The Declaration was written over two centuries ago. As a result, the
language is a little stilted, a little archaic by today's standards.
Nevertheless, the fundamental principles are not obscure, ambiguous or
difficult to comprehend.
The Declaration's second sentence is the most important. It
reads:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life,
Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
At first reading, that sentence and first principle may seem unremarkable
but is arguably the single, most radical political statement in the last twenty centuries.
However, the heart and principle of the sentence is simple:
Each and every living man and woman is individually and equally endowed
by God with certain rights.
Second principle--government's primary
duty to secure God-given rights
The third sentence of the Declaration declares:
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men
deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
And therein we find the Declaration's second basic principle:
The primary duty of government is to secure to each man and woman
their God-given, unalienable Rights.
(Incidentally, how can a government that insists on the "separation of
church and state" perform the primary duty of securing to each man his
God-given, unalienable Rights? I.e., how can a government that denies
the political influence and sovereignty of God also secure the
unalienable rights for which God is the source?)
Third principle--man's duty to throw off
government that fails to secure God-given rights
The third principle is found in the fourth and sixth sentences of the
Declaration which read:
"That whenever any Form of Government becomes destruction of these ends,
it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute
new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its
powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their
Safety and Happiness. . . . But when a long train of abuses and
usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce
them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw
off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
Where the fourth sentence reads, "That whenever any Form of Government
becomes destructive of these ends," the words "these ends" refer to the
purposes of government as declared or implied in the first two principles: 1)
recognize as self-evident that all men are endowed by God with certain
"unalienable Rights"; and 2) secure those God-given rights.
Thus, the third principle of the Declaration is:
It is the right and duty of the people to "throw off" any
government that refuses to recognize and secure each man's God-given,
unalienable rights.
And to whom do we owe that duty? To our fellow man? To our
nation? Or to God, Himself?
I believe the answer is God. I believe that "resistance to tyranny is
service to God."
Who wrote all those 'things'... all those 'ideas'? It was none other than that Patriot and homegrown terrorist himself -- Thomas Jefferson
Did King George think that those writings were "homegrown terrorism"? Those statements surely were part of "the use, planned use or threatened use of force or violence by a group or individual born, raised, or based and operating primarily within the United States or any possession of the United States to intimidate or coerce the United States government, the civilian population of the United States, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives".
Were those principles that American's hold near and dear defined as "violent radicalization" in 1776?
These principles gave us "the process of adopting or promoting an extremist belief system for the purpose of facilitating ideologically based violence to advance political, religious or social change." Ideologically based violence, in turn, is defined as "the use, planned use or threatened use of force or violence by a group or individual to promote the group or individual's political, religious or social beliefs."
Without those writings above, we may all be shouting "LONG LIVE THE QUEEN" today!
Don't tell Jane Harman that Thomas Jefferson is dead, as her new homegrown terrorism Commission may just try and find him and root him out as a domestic terrorist!
Click here to tell the entire Senate, vote NO on S. 1955 the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 by sending your ActiFax Blasts (that's 100 faxes for $25) to the entire Senate.
Join us as we stand with our Founding Fathers who stood for liberty and justice for all, even those who voiced opposition to governmental acts!
Faithfully,
Bryan Malatesta
Exec. Director
LaptopAmerica.net
ps: thanks to Ron Avery for his notes on Principles of Property!
Housekeeping note:
Free Listing of all Congressmen and Senators here.
To Unsubscribe click here
 copy;2005 Laptop Activist, LLC | 152 W. Main St. Westminster, MD 21157
|
|